Jude Law Stars in a Polarizing Political Drama: The Wizard of the Kremlin

As the film landscape buzzes with reboots and sequels, actor Jude Law emerges as a compelling presence in the cinematic world, aligning himself with projects that both challenge and intrigue audiences. His recent work culminates in Olivier Assayas’ latest film, The Wizard of the Kremlin, which is based on the novel by Giuliano da Empoli, tracing the intricate rise of Vladimir Putin through the eyes of a fictional character, Vadim Baranov.

A Complex Narrative

The Wizard of the Kremlin delves into the political upheaval experienced in Russia during the post-Soviet era. The story is primarily seen through the character Vadim Baranov, played by Paul Dano, who portrays a multifaceted figure reminiscent of real-life political strategist Vladislav Surkov. Dano’s chilly performance complements the film’s stark tone, presenting a layered perspective on the machinations of power.

The film is further bolstered by a notable cast, including Alicia Vikander and Jeffrey Wright. However, it faces criticism for how it narrates this compelling historical backdrop. Assayas opts for a clinical approach, immersing viewers in a rapid-fire exposition that often feels disjointed and overwhelming.

An Inside Look That Fails to Connect

The movie uses a dual-timeline structure, weaving through Baranov’s early years as an artist in 1990s Moscow and his subsequent political aspirations to elevate Putin within the Russian government. Critics point out that while the film aims for depth, its execution keeps key events and characters at a distance from the audience.

One notable controversy surrounding the film is Law’s portrayal of Putin, which arrives almost an hour into the narrative. Critics have remarked that his resemblance veers more toward Martin Freeman, which further dilutes the historical resonance intended by the filmmakers. Despite appearing late, Law’s performance is recognized as commanding, elevating scenes where he shares the screen with Dano.

Themes and Execution

The film struggles with thematic insight, often succumbing to its own pacing. While the back-and-forth storytelling is intended to keep audiences engaged, it often feels like a rapid recitation instead of an exploration. Viewers are left feeling more as if the film is talking at them rather than inviting them to reflect.

Assayas does capture some visceral moments, including a striking scene with Vikander that pushes the film’s artistic boundaries. However, the overall tone remains stiff, causing the film’s thematic ambitions to falter. The abruptness of its ending is polarizing, leaving many feeling perplexed by where the narrative concluded.

Film Details and Reception

The Wizard of the Kremlin is set for release on January 21, 2026, and has garnered attention as part of the 2025 Toronto International Film Festival. With a runtime of 156 minutes, the film aims to portray a nuanced examination of power, politics, and personal ambition.

Despite the film’s shortcomings, its ambitious premise and a talented cast offer glimpses of what could have been a powerful narrative. The chasm between expectation and execution raises questions about the challenges of adapting significant political themes for a cinematic format.

Conclusion: The Importance of Storytelling in Film

The Wizard of the Kremlin serves as a reflection of the complexities inherent in storytelling about real-world events. Although the film grapples with its own narrative flaws, it brings to light the essential conversations surrounding political manipulation and personal fate during tumultuous times.

Law’s ongoing renaissance, highlighted by this film, underscores a pressing need for stories that resonate with contemporary issues. As viewers prepare for its release, the mixed critical reception invites deeper contemplation about the interplay of art, history, and the intricacies of the human condition.